|
|||||
From:
Mike Turner
Date: 2/3/2010 4:23:36 PM Your Carb. is probably not set right and check your spark plug gap. My TFR starts better after I adjusted the carb. | |||||
From:
Muhulica
Date: 3/29/2013 9:42:56 PM How long have you lived here? Amateur my ass! Total bullshit. Why not just call a pro a pro? I'm sure evyoerne's got a pro camera package like that one to shoot their gf's tits with! LOL! Love her puffy nipples tho. | |||||
From:
Pearse
Date: 10/24/2015 6:55:02 PM Awesome tips. Positive energy is cgotaiouns and Gloria's story should be an inspiration to Real Estate pros who don't believe that social media marketing is worth their and effort.I guess Realtors need to set themselves free for the short-term transaction mentality and understand that social media works slowly but surely.On social media, a home buyer maybe asking a question today but he would be interested in hiring a Realtor 6 months later. The socially active Realtor (as in Gloria's case), who is readily available answer the prospect's question thoroughly and promptly, will instantly gain prospects trust. The key here is to understand that people are screening agents online and comparing between them. So the smart thing to do is to offer genuine help to prospects, WITHOUT expecting overnight sales. That's it.Great interview. I will share it for sure. Thank you for this healthy does of inspiration | |||||
From:
Vicky
Date: 12/29/2015 4:15:50 PM You could be wildly off the true avarege and still track relative review times as long as you had some reason to think that the bias of the sample in question would have the reports be wildly off in the same direction.You are right that successful submissions are reported more than unsuccessful submissions we have already been comparing the data here to the data from other journals (per your suggestion).Another thing I've been looking at by comparing some of the data to other journals are the relative review times. Relative review times in the cases I have looked at so far do seem to track relative review times from actual journal reports. | |||||
|